THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN IRAQI LAW

• Naji Marmoos Khalaf

  Faculty of Medical and Industrial Plants, Iraq

Objective: This research aims to clarify the legal provisions governing administrative decisions and their legal structure. It seeks to analyze the fundamental elements that distinguish administrative decisions from similar concepts while exploring their legal validity and limitations. Method: The study employs a qualitative legal analysis method, focusing on the formal and objective pillars required for an administrative decision to be legally valid. This involves a comparative examination of relevant legal frameworks and administrative practices. Results:  The research identifies the distinct elements of administrative decisions that differentiate them from other legal concepts. Additionally, it highlights the mechanisms by which administrative decisions are terminated, either through cancellation or withdrawal, ensuring their alignment with public interest and the continuity of public services. Novelty: The study provides a comprehensive legal perspective on the structure and termination of administrative decisions, offering insights into their binding authority and unique characteristics. It contributes to a deeper understanding of how administrative actions serve public interests while maintaining legal validity.

G. F. Mahdi, "The Legal Limits of the Jurisdictions of the Administrative Court in Iraq," Journal of Justice, vol. 2, Iraq, 2001, p. 81.

K. Ahmed, The Case for Cancellation and Suspension of the Implementation of the Administrative Decision, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 1993, p. 24.

M. K. Hussein, Direct Implementation of Administrative Decisions, Baghdad, 1979, p. 20.

G. Saad, General Administrative Law, University Library, Burt, 2004, p. 97.

N. K. Ahmed and M. A. Jawad, Administrative Judiciary, Al-Ghufran Library, Baghdad, 2010, p. 83.

A. A. Musharraf, Continuous Administrative Decision, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 2004, p. 69.

Awabdi, Theory of Administrative Decisions between Management Science and Administrative Law, 2nd ed., Dar Homa for Printing, Publishing and Distribution, Algeria, 1969, p. 23.

M. S. A. Al-Jubouri, Principles of Administrative Law, Dar Al-Kutub for Printing, Mosul, 1996, p. 229.

Boudiaf, The Case for Cancellation in the Civil and Administrative Procedures Law, 1st ed., Al-Jusoor for Publishing and Distribution, Algeria, 2009, p. 75.

M. S. H. Amin, Principles of Administrative Law, University House of Culture, Cairo, 1997, p. 521.

R. Khalloufi, Administrative Disputes Law, Office of University Publications, Ben Aknoun, 2001, p. 59.

M. H. Tabatabani, The Beginning of Wisdom, Islamic Knowledge Foundation, Qom, 1997, p. 118.

E. N. Ismail, The Legal Nature of Administrative Decisions, op. cit., p. 67.

T. Hussein, Administrative Law, Dar El Khaldounia, Algeria, 2007, p. 85.

M. R. A. Wahab, The General Theory of Administrative Decisions, New University House, Alexandria, 2008, p. 93.

S. J. Al-Din, Principles of Administrative Law, University Publications House, Part 2, Alexandria, 1996, p. 62.

S. Y. Khater, Administrative Decision, 2nd ed., Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Egypt, 2008, p. 45.

Hamada, Administrative Decisions and Judicial Control, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Jami, Alexandria, 2004, p. 200.

M. S. Belali, Administrative Decisions, Dar Al Uloom for Publishing and Distribution, Algeria, 2005, p. 64.

A. Rahman, "The scope of the discretionary authority of the administration in the electronic administrative decision," Journal of the Faculty of Law for Legal and Political Sciences, University of Kirkuk, vol. 9, pp. 33–48.

R. Khalloufi, Administrative Disputes Law, op. cit., p. 62.

M. A. Hamada, Administrative Decisions, Judicial Control, op. cit., p. 29.

S. Al-Tamawi, Principles of Administrative Law, Cairo, 1978, p. 64.

Jaafar, Administrative Decisions, 2nd ed., Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 2005, p. 17.

• View Article

• Law

Copyright (c) 2024 Naji Marmoos Khalaf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.