CONSUMER RIGHTS AND CONTRACT FAIRNESS: COMPARATIVE STUDY

• Kubaeva Ismigul Farkhod Kizi

  Lecturer of the Department of Civil Law, Tashkent State University Law, Uzbekistan

Objective: This study aims to compare the regulation of consumer contracts and unfair terms in the European Union (EU) and Uzbekistan, focusing on legal safeguards to protect consumers as the weaker party in contractual relationships. The research evaluates the extent to which these jurisdictions address information asymmetry and power imbalances through their legislative frameworks, with particular emphasis on the EU’s Unfair Contract Terms Directive (UCTD) and Uzbekistan’s broader consumer protection laws. Methods: The research employs a comparative legal analysis, reviewing legislative texts, judicial interpretations, and relevant case studies from both the EU and Uzbekistan. It examines the principles underlying the EU’s harmonized regulatory framework, including the contra proferentem rule and partial nullity, and contrasts these with Uzbekistan’s reliance on general prohibitions and undefined criteria for fairness in consumer contracts. Additionally, the study assesses the practical implications of these legal approaches for consumers and businesses. Results: The findings reveal significant differences in consumer protection mechanisms between the EU and Uzbekistan. The EU’s detailed and harmonized framework offers clear definitions, illustrative examples, and principles to mitigate power imbalances, ensuring consistent application across member states. In contrast, Uzbekistan’s legislation lacks specific criteria for unfair terms, leading to potential inconsistencies in judicial practice and weaker consumer trust in regulatory protections. Novelty: This study contributes to the comparative discourse on consumer protection by highlighting the advanced features of the EU’s legal framework and identifying gaps in Uzbekistan’s approach. It proposes adopting key elements of the UCTD, such as defining unfair terms, incorporating criteria like significant imbalance and breach of good faith, and introducing protective measures for pre-drafted contracts. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers seeking to strengthen consumer protection in developing legal systems.

B. van Leeuwen and B. van Leeuwen, “European Standardisation and the Unfair Contract Terms Directive,” in Better Regulation in EU Contract Law, Hart Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.5040/9781509928385.ch-008.

W. M. CHAN and P. S. TAY, “Unfair Contract Terms and Consumer Protection: Legislative and Judicial Controls in Malaysia,” in Contents of Contracts and Unfair Terms, Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 260–283. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198850427.003.0013.

A. Abdul Aziz, S. Mohamed Isa, S. Shaik Ahmad Yusoff, and C. O. Tze, “Towards Harmonisation of the ASEAN Contract Law: The Legal Treatment of Unfair Consumer Contract Terms Among Selected ASEAN Member States,” Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, vol. 2, no. 1, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.17576/ajag-2011-2-6542.

A. J. Wulf, “The Transaction Costs Latent Variable Model,” in Institutional Competition between Optional Codes in European Contract Law, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 245–260. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-05801-2_8.

C. Parish, “Pay:mixed blessings for HCAs: While some healthcare assistants have been rewarded for their skills, others feel they have been held back,” Nursing Standard, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 12–13, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.7748/ns.21.4.12.s20.

C. Gardiner, “Standard form consumer contracts: the background and context,” in Unfair Contract Terms in the Digital Age, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 9–33. doi: 10.4337/9781800886179.00007.

M. W. Hesselink, “Contract theory and EU contract law,” in Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. doi: 10.4337/9781782547372.00031.

I. F. Kolontaevskaya, “CONCEPT, NATURE, ESSENCE AND FEATURES CORPORATE RELATIONS,” Moscow University Bulletin of them SY Witte Series 2 Legal science, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2019, doi: 10.21777/2587-9472-2019-1-73-79.

O. A. Makarova and Y. I. Kovalevskaya, “Conceptual framework and system of the Model law of the Commonwealth of Independent States ‘On Protection of Consumers,’” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 768–785, 2023, doi: 10.21638/spbu14.2023.313.

H. Kötz, “The Control of Unfair Contract Terms,” in European Contract Law, Oxford University Press, 2017. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198800040.003.0008.

C. Poncibó, “Book Review: Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law, edited by Christian Twigg-Flesner. (Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (US): Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2016.),” European Review of Private Law, vol. 25, no. Issue 4, pp. 821–829, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.54648/erpl2017051.

L. Tichý, “Introduction,” European Review of Private Law, vol. 24, no. Issue 6, pp. 927–928, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.54648/erpl2016056.

O. Svensson, “The Unfair Contract Terms Directive: Meaning and further Development,” Nordic Journal of European Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 24–38, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.36969/njel.v3i2.22099.

E. Cortot-Boucher, “France: Minister vs. Société Bayerische Hypo und Vereinsbank,” in Tax Treaty Case Law around the Globe 2015, IBFD, 2016. doi: 10.59403/3rv54kq010.

• View Article

• Digital Marketing

Copyright (c) 2024 Kubaeva Ismigul Farkhod Kizi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.