m

IDENTIFICATION OF COURT DECISIONS RELATED TO ONLINE ARISAN CASES IN INDONESIA FROM 2018-2024

Authors
  • Ashila Xaviena Almira Molla

    Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo, Indonesia
  • Mochammad Tanzil Multazam

    Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Keywords:
Online arisan, Law, Legal cases, PRISMA method, Fraud and embezzlement
Abstract

Objective: This research discusses the phenomenon of online rotating savings and credit associations (arisan) in Indonesia, which are becoming increasingly popular but also vulnerable to legal violations such as embezzlement and fraud. Method: Using the PRISMA method, this study identifies, screens, evaluates, and analyzes cases of online arisan from 2018 to 2024. Results: Based on data analysis from the Supreme Court Decisions, 249 cases related to online arisan were found, peaking in 2021. The study also explores the applicable legal framework, including the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), to understand the challenges and solutions in protecting arisan participants. The research results indicate that better legal awareness and regulation are needed to reduce the risk of violations in online arisan. Novelty: This research provides a systematic review of online arisan cases in Indonesia over a six-year period, combining legal case analysis with the PRISMA method to highlight trends, legal challenges, and the need for improved participant protection.

References

R. S. Dewi, “Comparison of Consumer Protection Laws Between Indonesia , the Philippines , and South Korea in Achieving Justice,” vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 2024.

A. A. Mustikajati, A. Jalan, I. Sutami, and J. Tengah, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Berdasarkan Perspektif KUHP Dan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik terhadap harta benda orang yang diatur dalam Pasal 378 Buku II Bab XXV KUHP kemudian Pemerintah menetapkan Unda,” vol. 1, no. 2, 2024.

Y. K. Wardani, T. L. Tobing, P. Ariyanti, D. L. Sonata, and D. E. Rusmawati, “Anticipating Financial and Data Privacy Risk: Assessing Legal Rights and Responsibilities in Online Social Gathering in Indonesia,” Indones. Priv. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 123–136, 2023, doi: 10.25041/iplr.v4i2.3027.

Mahkamah Agung, “Direktori Putusan.” Accessed: Aug. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=%22arisan+online%22

A. Dary, N. Rusmana, A. S. Mulyani, T. Fitriah, and M. Kn, “Legal Protection Of Unlicensed Online Arisan Victims Reviewed From Article 1243 Of The Civil Code Concerning Tort,” vol. 1, no. 2, 2023.

A. E. Dwi Saputra, “Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Arisan Online di Indonesia,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2024.

N. A. Juang, M. K. Hidayat, and S. L. Andriati, “Problematika Wanprestasi Atas Perjanjian Arisan Online,” J. Ilm. Dunia Huk., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, 2022, doi: 10.35973/jidh.v7i1.3065.

A. Matondang, “Faktor-faktor yang Mengakibatkan Perceraian dalam Perkawinan,” J. Ilmu Pemerintah. dan Sos. Polit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma

T. Pratiwi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Arisan Online (Studi Putusan Nomor 897/Pid.B/2020/PN Btm),” J. Meta Huk, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022.

E. K. Dewi, A. A. S. Laksmi Dewi, and I. M. M. Widyantara, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Arisan Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016,” J. Konstr. Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 296–302, 2021, doi: 10.22225/jkh.2.2.3226.296-302.

R. S. D. Dimas Wahyudi, Herixson Sugiarto Samosir, “Akibat Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online Melalui Modus Arisan Online Di Mediasosial Elektronik,” J. Rectum, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 183, 2022.

M. A. Ali, M. A. Azad, M. Parreno Centeno, F. Hao, and A. van Moorsel, “Consumer-facing technology fraud: Economics, attack methods and potential solutions,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 100, pp. 408–427, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.041.

H. van Driel, “Financial fraud, scandals, and regulation: A conceptual framework and literature review,” Bus. Hist., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1259–1299, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1519026.

J. Wiwoho, D. B. Kharisma, and D. T. K. Wardhono, “Financial Crime In Digital Payments,” J. Cent. Bank. Law Institutions, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–70, 2021, doi: 10.21098/jcli.v1i1.7.

P. A. Sanggo and D. Lukitasari, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penipuan Arisan Online Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Recidive, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 2016.

S. Q. Tiflen, “TINJAUAN HUKUM EKONOMI ISLAM TERHADAP PRAKTEK ARISAN ONLINE DI KOTA JAYAPURA,” Al-Mustashfa J. Penelit. Huk. Ekon. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021.

H. Vidhitasmoro, S.H, D. C. K. S.H., M.H., and D. E. S. S.H., M.Hum., “The Power of Proof of an Online Arisan Agreement in the Verdict of PKPU Number 10/Pdt-Sus-PKPU/2021/Pn.Smg in Accordance with the Theory ofLegal Positivism and Justice,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Hum. Res., vol. 7, no. 04, pp. 2484–2491, 2024, doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i04-33.

L. Puspita and A. Gunadi, “Analisis Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Lisan Arisan Online Yang Menggunakan Media Aplikasi Facebook Messenger Dalam Pembuktian Di Pengadilan Ditinjau Dari Undang- Undang Informasi Dan Teknologi Elektronik Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 106/Pdt.G,” J. Huk. Adigama, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 27, 2019, doi: 10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6520.

B. S. Bethari, “Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Arisan Online,” SUPREMASI J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–94, 2021, doi: 10.36441/supremasi.v4i1.528.

M. Adaninggar, F. Andhika Perkasa, and A. U. Hosnah, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dan Konsekuensi Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Dengan Modus Arisan Melalui Platform Media Sosial,” Civilia J. Kaji. Huk. dan Pendidik. Kewarganegaraan, vol. 3, pp. 63–71, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.anfa.co.id

M. J. de C. Soares, G. G. Moniz, and L. Ribeiro, “Implementation of Electronic Government (E-Government) and Bureaucracy Reform to Achieve Good Governance,” Leg. Br., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2734–2741, 2022, doi: 10.35335/legal.

Nurhadi Ahmad Juang, “Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Wanprestasi Atas Perjanjian Arisan Online Pada Putusan Nomor 1/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN Trt,” R. Stud. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–33, 2023, doi: 10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11435.

N. D. Rahmawati, “Law Enforcement Against Online Arisan Fraud Perpetrators Who Conduct Fictitious Arisan Auctions ( Case Study of Sukoharjo Police Station Cases ),” pp. 107–114.

H. Khoirunnisa, H. Ayu, and F. S. Faried, “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbentuk Arisan Online,” vol. 01, no. 04, pp. 40–45, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.uniba.ac.id/journal.uniba.ac.id/index.php/JB/article/download/888/627/2288

W. Tanjaya and J. Pakpahan, “Punishment for fraud offenders through online arisan in medan city,” vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 30–32, 2022

Downloads
Published
2025-03-30
Section
Artikel
License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ashila Xaviena Almira Molla, Mochammad Tanzil Multazam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

IDENTIFICATION OF COURT DECISIONS RELATED TO ONLINE ARISAN CASES IN INDONESIA FROM 2018-2024. (2025). International Journal of Economic Integration and Regional Competitiveness, 2(3), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijeirc.v2i3.416

Similar Articles

41-50 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.