antis publisher

ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN DIGITAL ADVERTISING: ITS EFFECTS ON ETHICAL MARKETING PRACTICES

Authors
  • Shaher Rekan Radhi

    AL-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq
  • Aysar Abduladheem Dakhyliy

    AL-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq
Keywords:
Algorithmic Bias, Digital Advertising, Ethical Marketing Practices, Data-Driven Personalization, Algorithmic Transparency, Consumer Privacy
Abstract

Objective: This study examines the effect of algorithmic bias in digital advertising on ethical marketing practices in Iraqi organizations. The study focuses on three dimensions of algorithmic bias: demographic targeting bias, data-driven personalization bias, and algorithmic transparency and accountability deficiency. Ethical marketing practices were measured through fairness, transparency, privacy protection, accountability, non-discrimination, and respect for consumer rights. Method:
The study adopted a quantitative approach based on a structured questionnaire distributed to a sample of 270 respondents working in advertising agencies, e-commerce companies, telecommunications firms, banking institutions, retail companies, technology companies, and related organizations in Iraq. The data were analyzed using reliability testing, KMO and Bartlett’s test, descriptive statistics, and generalized linear regression. Results: The results showed that the questionnaire had strong reliability, with Cronbach’s Alpha values ranging from 0.814 to 0.922, and strong construct validity, with an overall KMO value of 0.924. The descriptive results indicated high levels of awareness regarding algorithmic bias and ethical marketing practices. The regression results confirmed that the three dimensions of algorithmic bias had statistically significant effects on ethical marketing practices. Algorithmic transparency and accountability deficiency had the strongest effect, followed by data-driven personalization bias and demographic targeting bias. Novelty: The study concludes that ethical digital marketing requires systematic auditing of algorithms, stronger transparency, clear accountability mechanisms, responsible use of consumer data, and fair treatment of all consumer groups.

.

References

[1] V. Markou, D. P. Sakas, and P. Trivellas, “Personalization, trust, and identity in AI-based marketing,” Adm. Sci., vol. 15, no. 11, p. 440, 2025, doi: 10.3390/admsci15110440.

[2] H. Borimnejad, M. Sadeghi, and B. Taheri, “Emerging trends, challenges, and research opportunities in artificial intelligence-based digital marketing,” Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, p. 187, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44163-025-00705-y.

[3] S. Zulaikha, H. Mohamed, and N. Ahmad, “Unveiling the intellectual landscape of artificial intelligence in digital marketing: A bibliometric review,” Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, p. 14, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s44163-025-00740-9.

[4] B. Imana, A. Korolova, and J. Heidemann, “Auditing for discrimination in algorithms delivering job ads,” in Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 3767–3778. doi: 10.1145/3442381.3450077.

[5] P. Sapiezynski, A. Ghosh, L. Kaplan, A. Rieke, and A. Mislove, “Algorithms that ``don’t see color’’: Measuring biases in lookalike and special ad audiences,” in Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, pp. 609–616. doi: 10.1145/3514094.3534135.

[6] Y. Zhang and H. Li, “Fairness evaluation of marketing algorithms: A framework for equity distribution,” Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 251–268, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEBDE-07-2023-0013.

[7] S. Ozturkcan, “AI booing and AI washing cycle of AI mistrust,” J. Advert. Res., 2025, doi: 10.1177/14707853251379285.

[8] R. Wei and J. Moisander, “Algorithmic agencing in platform markets,” Marketing Theory, 2024, doi: 10.1177/14705931241275558.

[9] D. D. Prior, J. Keränen, and E. Jaakkola, “Transitioning to artificial intelligence-based key account management: Opportunities, challenges, and future research,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 124, pp. 108–121, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.007.

[10] C. Ledro, A. Nosella, and A. Vinelli, “Artificial intelligence in customer relationship management: Literature review and future research directions,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 186, p. 114988, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114988.

[11] Y. Zhan, K. H. Tan, G. Ji, L. Chung, and A. S. F. Chiu, “The impact of artificial intelligence adoption for business-to-business marketing,” Information & Management, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 103899, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2024.103899.

[12] W. Rodgers and T. Nguyen, “Advertising benefits from ethical artificial intelligence algorithmic purchase decision pathways,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1043–1061, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05048-7.

[13] C. B. Satornino, S. Du, and J. F. Davis, “Using artificial intelligence to advance sustainable marketing,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 116, pp. 98–112, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.12.007.

[14] C. L. Pedersen, T. Ritter, and C. A. Di Benedetto, “Digital authenticity: Towards a research agenda for the AI-driven future,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 119, pp. 79–91, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.009.

[15] H. K. Alhitmi, F. Alduais, and A. F. Almulhim, “Data security and privacy concerns of AI-driven marketing: A systematic literature review,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2393743, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2393743.

[16] N. M. Barbosa, G. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Who am I? A design probe exploring real-time transparency about online and offline user profiling underlying targeted ads,” Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 88, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3478119.

[17] J. Burgess, N. Carah, D. Angus, A. Obeid, and M. Andrejevic, “Why am I seeing this ad? The affordances and limits of automated user-level explanation in Meta’s advertising system,” New Media Soc., 2024, doi: 10.1177/14614448241251796.

[18] J. R. Saura, V. Škare, and Đ. Ozretić Došen, “Is AI-based digital marketing ethical? Assessing a new data privacy paradox,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 100597, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100597.

[19] M. De-Arteaga, S. Feuerriegel, and M. Saar-Tsechansky, “Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 3749–3770, 2022, doi: 10.1111/poms.13869.

[20] J. Wang, “The impact of modern technology on student learning outcomes,” in Addressing global challenges-exploring socio-cultural dynamics and sustainable solutions in a changing world, Routledge, 2024, pp. 514–519.

[21] H. Hari, R. Iyer, and B. Sampat, “Exploring ethical frontiers of artificial intelligence in marketing,” Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 21, p. 100096, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100096.

[22] M. Bui, “Algorithmic discrimination: A grounded conceptualization,” Inf. Commun. Soc., 2025, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2025.2516544.

[23] X. Wang, “Algorithmic discrimination: Examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices,” AI and Ethics, vol. 4, pp. 1053–1067, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00332-y.

[24] X. Wang, X. Lin, and B. Shao, “How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots in online customer service,” Information & Management, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 103883, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2023.103883.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-04-28
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN DIGITAL ADVERTISING: ITS EFFECTS ON ETHICAL MARKETING PRACTICES. (2026). International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science, 3(4), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijblps.v3i4.478

Similar Articles

31-40 of 112

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.