THE PERSON GUILTY IMPROVEMENT WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FINISH

• Tangriev Jasur Olimovich

  Department of the Prosecutor's Office of the Bukhara region, Uzbekistan

Objective: This article examines the historical development of the Institute for the termination of criminal proceedings without resolving guilt in criminal procedure legislation, aiming to identify issues and propose effective solutions. Method: The analysis involved reviewing scientific opinions on the institute, studying the gaps in national legislation, and critically assessing the legal and procedural frameworks surrounding case terminations. Results:  The study identified significant loopholes and inaccuracies in the legislation, highlighting procedural deficiencies and the need for amendments. Suggestions for legislative improvement were also proposed. Novelty: The article provides a unique perspective on enhancing the effectiveness of the institute by addressing specific shortcomings in the legal framework, contributing valuable insights for the development of criminal procedure legislation.

B. Ya. Gavrilov, "The stage of initiating a criminal case: Opinions of practitioners and scholars," Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 4, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/stadiya-vozbuzhdeniya-ugolovnogo-dela-mnenie-praktikov-i-uchenyh. [Accessed: Nov. 23, 2024].

Russian Legislation of the 10th-20th Centuries," vol. 6, p. 163. [Online]. Available: https://www.prlib.ru/item/1874387. [Accessed: Nov. 23, 2024].

D. A. Kerimov, Methodology of Law (Subject, Functions, Problems of the Philosophy of Law). Moscow: [publisher not specified], 2000, p. 110. [Online]. Available: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI/KERIMOV_2000.pdf. [Accessed: Nov. 23, 2024].

A. P. Ryzhakov, Criminal Procedure. Moscow, 2019, p. 440.

A. S. Barabash and L. M. Volodina, Termination of Criminal Cases on Non-Rehabilitative Grounds at the Preliminary Investigation Stage. Tomsk, 1986, p. 37.

S. A. Sheyfer, Termination of a Case in the Soviet Criminal Process: Abstract of Candidate of Legal Sciences Dissertation. Moscow, 1963, pp. 4–5.

M. Sunnatjon, “FEATURES OF TERMINATION OF A CRIMINAL CASE,” Web Sci. Sci. Res. J., vol. 5, no. 01, pp. 97–105, 2024.

E. Maculan and A. G. Gil, “The Rationale and Purposes of Criminal Law and Punishment in Transitional Contexts,” Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 132–157, 2020, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqz033.

Presidential Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Measures to Improve Criminal and Criminal Procedure Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan," May 14, 2018, No. PQ–3723. [Online]. Available: https://lex.uz/docs/3735818. [Accessed: Nov. 23, 2024].

J. Q. Smith and G. R. Macqueen, “Going, Going, But Not Quite Gone,” Judicature, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 26–39, 2017.

H. Friedman and J. Kaplan, Civil Consequences of Criminal Cases. 2012.

D. M. Engel and E. H. Steele, “Civil Cases and Society: Process and Order in the Civil Justice System,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 295–346, 1979, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1979.tb01023.x.

M. D. Mckay, A. E. Millstein, C. C. Histed, and J. C. Rothermich, “Staying Out Of Trouble : The Basics Every Civil Litigator Should Know About Staying Civil Proceedings When One of the Parties Faces Criminal Exposure,” Natl. Law Rev., vol. 9, no. 341, 2024.

G. I. Sedova, N. M. Peretyatko, and A. E. Fedyunin, “Preventions Of Criminal Proceedings In The Conditions Of Digitalization,” in European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2022, pp. 528–533. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2022.01.84.

F. D’Alessandra, “UN Accountability Mandates in International Justice,” J. Int. Crim. Justice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 551–578, 2023, doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqad038.

• View Article

• Law

Copyright (c) 2024 Tangriev Jasur Olimovich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.